Hi Felix, > Well it does not look so bad that mkgmap should crash. There are about > 40-50 nodes that have no tags attached to them at all (except if someone > cleaned up before me looking at it). In my eyes this should not lead > mkgmap to crash.
Ideally, yes, it shouldn't crash on any data but, at this time, mkgmap can't cope with a small area that contains more nodes/arcs than are allowed in a subdivision. I am not saying this issue cannot be fixed but, to me, it's a low priority because no "sensible" map should contain such a cluster of nodes. At least now it tells you where the problem area is. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
