the attached java classes together with the patch enables mkgmap to
  create contour lines directly from digital elevation model (DEM)
  data. This may be useful for those who don't want to ceate contour
  lines with other tools and store them in huge(!) files.

That seems very cool, and I look forward to trying it.  It would be nice
to have a few intermediate abilities (I've read most the rest of the
thread by now):

  output osm format data from the DEM (for other use, or later use, or
  for intermediate reprocessing)

  make an img that's transparent with the DEM data, not only for
  licensing reasons but also because it really seems like something the
  user would want to flip off sometimes.

For the first point, my immediate reaction was that it was too bad this
was in mkgmap instead of a standalone utility, but I see the
intermediate storage issue.  Having the code in mkgmap is not a big
deal, and it enables the nice behavior of an internal pipeline.

This isn't really related to your work, but it seems to me that mkgmap
has grown tons of options, and modern recommended usage is to have a lot
of them on.  It would be nice if every option had a negative form and
there was a --best-practice option that enabled all the ones that are
recommended for making the best garmin maps (complete with tdb etc.  for
turning into gmapi, and everything else one would need).  Right now it
seems a little hard to use, where everyone has to chase down those
options and write a script.

I can certainly see where at one time each of these options might have
caused trouble and thus was not default, and the notion that behavior
shouldn't change for compatibility.  But I also wonder how many users
really want that rather than just to make a img file for their receiver.




Attachment: pgp9TT5r5LTIJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to