Yeah that's true, but how to do it better? I would think a name-file where you can run rules for name, info sections , phone numbers, etc. seperate from the style-file would be best. Currently of my lines style-file which consists of 8.000 lines, 7.000 are basically only to get proper naming, ideally I have to blow it up million lines to get all attributes into the name that I would like to be stated there. As the name is in the route sections the only way to quickly check whether or not a route planned by autorouting (be it gps or mapsource) is nice or not.
Felix Mark Burton wrote: > Hi Felix, > > This is not a comment on your proposed scheme but I do believe that the > current handling of name and ref (and the highway shields, etc.) is > completely fucked up. IMHO, munging the element name and its refs > together in the style file is completely bogus. > > Cheers, > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
