Great, thanks a lot! Can I be so bold and grab go for the jackpot and ask if you plan on making the reverse working as well (feed KML into Splitter)?
Personally, I don't mind if there aren't many sanity check on reading the KML. If things bark because of an ill formed KML then that's the users error... On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:28:35 +0000 (UTC), Chris Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >>> If you like I could add a parameter to the splitter that generated >>> the KML file automatically so there's no need for the additional >>> script. >>> > L> That would be great to have. > > ...and now you have it :) I've just checked in an update that gives you > a --write-kml=<filename> parameter. Pretty much does what you'd expect, > writes > out a KML file to the specified filename in roughly the same format as that > > python script. The only real difference is I've named the areas "Map > 63240001" > etc, instead of "Area 1", "Area 2", ... Hopefully you'll agree that's a > bit more useful. > > Chris > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
