Mark Burton wrote:
Felix,
Here's the lines I had to comment out:
# route1=ferry { name '${name1}'; set toll=yes }
[0x06 road_class=1 road_speed=0 resolution 18 continue]
# route=ferry { name '${name} ferry' | 'ferry'; set toll=yes }
[0x06 road_class=1 road_speed=0 resolution 18 continue]
route1=ferry are ferries from relations.
I can't see what's wrong at the moment. In your style file do any other
rules match the ferry route (will any other lines be output for it?)
Well I don't explicitly search for anything else with "& route=ferry".
However I match the ferry itself two times. First time I match the ferry
via relations file, the second time I match the way itself. No other
rule matches.
Here's my relations file entry:
route=ferry & name=* { apply { set name1 = '${name}
ferry' | 'ferry'; add fromrelation=yes; add route1=ferry; set toll=yes } }
route=ferry { apply { add fromrelation=yes; add
route=ferry; set toll=yes } }
Did not notice any improvements on autorouting so far however (only
tried in Mapsource).
You may see some improvement where routable ways share a lot of points
with areas and other unroutable lines.
The crazy thing is that routing works less well. Maybe my introducing of
identical copies of the ways for displaying like routes and cycleway=*
improves routing on such ways?
Mark
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
