On Dec 23, 2009, at 0:55, Steve Ratcliffe wrote: > I don't think it would cause any problems with memory or cpu, but if > an extra argument is added to filter() then I would add the same one > to doFilter() since they are the really the same routine just split so > that the common code can be in the base class.
I updated the patch as you suggested and have attached it. I'd appreciate it if you could consider committing the patch. Cheers.
cg-notequal-filter-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
