I've tried the patch as well and it works nicely. Smaller maps, some map clutter removed and seems to be faster as well.
Regards Thilo Am 08.01.2010 um 21:48 schrieb Johann Gail: > > > Felix Hartmann schrieb: >> That patch works pretty nice. I upped the value to 40 and that gave >> nice results when zoomed far out. >> Here is the settings that I would find optimal >> resolution 24 == 4 (I think 4 is anyhow the minimum because if less >> than 4 pixels than it ain't an area) >> resolution 23 == 6 ( resolution 23 is not used by all GPS devices if >> resolution 24 and 22 are present) >> resolution 22 == 6 >> resolution 21 == 20 >> resolution 20 == 40 >> resolution 19 == 80 >> resolution >18 == 120 >> > Just to be sure there is no missunderstanding: You are not able to set > minsizes for each resolution. You haven't set them, or have you? > > The SizeFilter itself should shift the minsize according to the > resolution. I.e. if you init it with number 2 the following minsizes > should be uesed: > > resolution 24 = 2 > resolution 23 = 4 > resolution 22 = 8 > resolution 21 = 16 > resolution 20 = 32 > resolution 19 = 64 > resolution 18 = 128 > > which matches roughly your demands. > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
