Ralf Kleineisel schrieb: > On 01/09/2010 10:08 AM, WanMil wrote: > > >> Another idea is to add some specific tags by the mulitpolygon algorithm >> that link to the other pieces of the formerly big forrest. This could be >> evaluated by the SizeFilter? >> > > Another idea (don't know if this is possible): > > You have a big multipolygon forest. You could duplicate it. One copy > without small inner polygons for the low resolutions. Another copy with > the inner polygons which gets splitted for the higher resolutions. The > copies could be marked with some mkgmap internal tag and used later. > > May I propose to move the whole multipolygon handling to the filter chain? Then there is _no need_ for additional tags and duplicated polygons and possible remerging of them. The filter chain is run for each resolution level. With each run the poylgons could be handled accordingly.
I don't think, your ideas are wrong. I appreciate your work. But I think its made more complicated than actually needed. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
