On 22.01.2010 16:56, Torsten Leistikow wrote:
> Felix Hartmann schrieb am 22.01.2010 16:30:
>
>> highway=*& copy=99& mtb:scale:uphill!=5& mtb:scale:uphill!=4 {
>> set dontadd=yes; set taxi=no; set dontadd=oneway; set mkgmap:unpaved=1
>> } [0x10711 resolution 21 continue with_actions] *output*
>>
> Actually, what is the difference between "continue with_actions" and
> "continue"?
> I think I have never really understood, which version must be used in what
> case.
> Can you provide an easy example, wich demonstrates the different results,
> whether the with_actions flag is used or not?
>
>
auxiliary tags can only set by [continue with_actions]
if you did (until 1498 it was working well) something like
highway=primary & oneway=yes & cycleway=opposite_lane & route=bicycle
{set oneway=-1} [0x... continue] then all actions inside {} are only
applied to the current way, and not forwarded. In order to keep
{oneway=-1} one had to use [continue with_actions].
> Gruss
> Torsten
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
