Hi Chris,
 
> Well it wasn't so much that I wasn't keen, just that at the time I wasn't 
> sure why you wanted it and was too lazy to implement it at the time :)  
> There's 
> actually another reason - there's a bug I accidentally introduced to the 
> splitter a while back which is related. Since I added support for the 
> bounding 
> box tag, the splitter doesn't work correctly if there are multiple osm files 
> given as input because only points inside the first file's bounding box are 
> considered for splitting. Once I fix that it should be easy to add support 
> for a --bound parameter (or you could simulate the same thing by supplying 
> an additional osm file that only contains a <bounds/> tag).

Using a small OSM file that contained the bounds tag would be fine
for my purposes.

> Currently I'm working on adding support for nested relations, including 
> relations 
> that are forward referenced. I thought it wasn't going to be too difficult 
> but it's proving a bit trickier than I thought. Once that's done I'll look 
> at fixing the above plus keeping whole multipolygon relations.

OK.

Thanks,

Mark
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to