> There have been different opinions about this patch.
>
> There is one controversal point:
> Should mkgmap allow nested inner polygons?
>
> From my point of view: YES. Because it does not harm in any way. The
> nested inner polygons I analysed were all reasonable. Ok, they are not
> 100% compliant to the specification but this is common to lots of others
> things in (anarchic) OSM.
>
> At the moment I see two possible changes:
> 1. Issue a warning for any nested inner polygon but process it anyhow.
> 2. Reject nested inner polygons (and issue a warning). What a pity but
> they are not 100% compliant.
>
> Please let me know what's the opinion of mkgmap community and committers
> because I want the improvements of error messages to be committed.
>
> WanMil
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
If it is not difficult to implement (also for others) then I would
propose integration.
If however we knew that mapnik could not implement it without major
rewrites, then I would not push it forward as long as it is not at least
accepted tagging for a larger minority.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
