On 23.03.2010 21:45, Mark Burton wrote:
> Hello Felix,
>
>
>> Could it be that the new for polygons "8" is much much bigger compared
>> to the old (using patch) "8"???
>> Or that the patch was not enacted on resolution 24??
>>
> Err, why?
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
Just again, I think your implementation really broke something. Using:
--min-polygon-size=1
I still miss loads of houses (that are at least 5-10 pixel big).
--min-polygon-size=200 makes maps still smaller and missing lotta more
polygons, so in principle this option is working (and syntax correct).
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
