Felix Hartmann wrote:
>
> Routable maps are in no way bigger than non routable maps (if there is
> no routable information inside, of course if you use the same style that
> is routable and compile it without --route it gets smaller, if you
> remove all road_class and road_speed from style, there is virtually no
> size difference).
This is not what I have observed. Using a style that does not have any route
info, accidentially activating --route caused it to grow significantly.
Maybe there is a different explanation, but until the reason is clear, I
must assume that a compulsory --route would cause the same.
Felix Hartmann wrote:
> Lazyness shouldn't break stuff. And continuing with
> this problem is no option, as the newest Oregon Firmware and all future
> Firmwares for other devices will crash too.
>
So if you're bulding for an Oregon and if you use the latest updates, you
need to specify --route.
This is no reason to force the owners of all other devices to do this, too.
Especially if you break the building of maps for older devices this way.
A sensible solution would be to either fix the problem for good by removing
those flags or introduce a new parameter/default behaviour that just creates
an empty version of the required block with less side effects than a global
--route.
bye
Nop
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Really-Serious-bug-when-not-using-route-tp5091135p5098195.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
