The posted links work only in merkaartor, as I noticed afterwards.
I use merkaartor at 99.9 %.

Sorry

Am 08.10.2010 16:23, schrieb Josef Latt:
> I forgot to list again the old ones:
> 
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.2509&lon=7.4284&zoom=12
> -> Gemeinde Hatzenport rel_546634
> -> Gemeinde Löf rel_546642
> -> Gemeinde Lehmen rel_546640
> 
> 
> Am 08.10.2010 16:07, schrieb Josef Latt:
>> Other boundaries shown as river:
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.7548&lon=7.3343&zoom=12
>> -> Relation 'Hennef (Sieg) rel_36042'
>>
>> Greetings
>> Josef
>>
>> Am 08.10.2010 07:37, schrieb Josef Latt:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 07.10.2010 21:37, schrieb Torsten Leistikow:
>>>> Josef Latt schrieb am 07.10.2010 20:03:
>>>>> That means that a tagging like this is false?
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>>     <tag k="boundary" v="administrative"/>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>>     <tag k="waterway" v="river"/>
>>>>
>>>> If the river itself is the boundary, then this tagging is ok.
>>>>
>>>> But in such a case, you can't complain, that the boundary is shown as a 
>>>> river,
>>>> because the displayed element is a river as well as a boundary. So it is 
>>>> just a
>>>> matter of display priority.
>>>>
>>>> >From your screenshot I can now guess, what you mean: There are also other 
>>>> >ways
>>>> in the map, which are dislpayed as river, although they are only tagged as
>>>> boundary AND NOT as river at the same time?
>>>>
>>>> If this is the case, I would guess, that the complete boundary is made up 
>>>> out of
>>>> a multipolygon.
>>>>
>>>> In this case the multipolygon tagging seems to be faulty. Either all outer 
>>>> ways
>>>> must be tagged the same (this can not be, since one part is tagged as a 
>>>> river,
>>>> while other parts shouldn't be rivers), or the tag values for the 
>>>> multipolygon
>>>> must be placed on the relation instead of the outer ways (this is also not 
>>>> done
>>>> in the example, since the boundary tag is on the way and not on the 
>>>> relation).
>>>
>>> That is to high for me, as I'm relativ new in tagging.
>>> But I can't see any difference to other boundaries with IMHO same
>>> tagging. E.g.
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.2275&lon=7.4450&zoom=15. It's
>>> rel_546624.
>>>
>>> Greetings
>>> Josef
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> 
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to