Marko Mäkelä wrote: > > Last time I was bicycling/mapping there, I got confused, because I > thought that there would be a connection between the highway=residential > (Kaskelanpolku) and the highway=secondary (Lahdentie). Of course, the > tunnel would not be considered for routing, because the ways share no > nodes, but the ways seemed to be connected on the map display. >
Hi, maybe this rules before your highway-rules in lines-file would solve your problem: bridge=yes | bridge=true [0x28 resolution 21 continue] tunnel=yes | tunnel=true [0x27 resolution 21 continue] aighes -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Missing-ways-part-2-tp5647895p5649892.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
