On 18.11.2010 23:34, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
> Hi
>
>> I think inventing such an operator would be a bad idea. It would be much
>> easier
>> to have a genenral negation i.e.
>>
>> !(expression)
> The style rules already allow general negation.
>
> If I've understood the conversation, then:
>
> !(tracktype< 5)
>
> does exactly what Felix wants it to do.
>
> ..Steve
This would work for a single condition. But not for does not exist or.
(or else I'm too stupid).
However I think something like this won't work
So would (!(tracktype<5)|condition2=yes) work? Meaning either
tracktype not equal smaller 5 or condition2=yes - one of the two has to
match for it to not stop the action.
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
