On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 11:02 -0600, Scott Crosby wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Danny Backx <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> I've taken some time and played with the suggestions given.
>
> I'm including two scripts.
[..]
> I realize that I'm working around something splitter is
> leaving
> unsolved, and I'm partially automating this, my question is
> whether all this is a good idea.
> If you're willing to do some work on the splitter to improve it, I
> think that yes, you could improve it in a few days of work to the
> point where this becomes a non-issue for you, and the splitter
> generates excellent and well-balanced tiles.
[..]
> There are a few catches in that you'll have to obey the alignment
> constraints that are required by mkgmap. (Which, alas, I do not
> know.). But that would solve your problem and might make the splitter
> more useful to others..
I'm afraid I don't qualify. Too much work already, and I don't have a
clue about those constraints (not a mkgmap user).
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
