Sorry for the late reply.
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 07:47:21AM +1300, Peter Hendricks wrote:
>I see where this is coming from. The problem is that there are other
>shelters, like roadside shelters that have nothing to do with buses.
>Like this one:
>
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/80909803
>
>It's a lay-by with gas, food, etc. and there is a shelter from sun and
>rain. Nothing to do with mountains or hiking. Perhaps this needs to be
>tagged differently, but in any case, even a mountain shelter shouldn't
>show up on the map as a campground. Perhaps 0x6402 building would be
>more appropriate? Label=shelter as well?
What about tourism=picnic_site, fireplace=yes, covered=yes? The default
style already translates it into 0x4a00.
I saw some tourism=lean_to when fixing a multipolygon issue in a natural
reserve today. I guess I should add tourism=lean_to to the default style
(translate it as amenity=shelter) and maybe add a comment next to
amenity=shelter suggesting that tourism=picnic_site or tourism=lean_to
(or highway=bus_stop, shelter=yes) should be used instead.
>Incidentally, the area highway=services on the GPS map turns into a POI
>"Exit Unknown" with an interesting properties page. Check it out @
>N14.85751 E100.09283
This is probably because you are using add-pois-to-areas. The default
style translates the POI with highway=services into 0x210f. I have not
seen any legitimate use of highway=services in Finland. There are some
(usually unmanned) driver rest areas next to major highways, which I
would tag as amenity=parking, parking=surface, surface=paved and
optionally with POIs for waste disposal, toilets, kiosks and such. I see
that the wiki now defines highway=rest_area for unmanned rest areas.
Best regards,
Marko
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
