Carlos Dávila schrieb:
> These are my results with index_branch r1792
>
>
>     1 tile map
>     2 tiles map
>     9 tiles map
> *POI search*
>     Yes
>     Yes
>     Yes
> *Cities*
> Accented characters
>     Yes
>     Yes     Yes
> Existing city
>     Yes (3)
>     Yes (3)
>     Yes (3)
> Existing region
>     Yes (1)
>     Yes (1)
>     Yes (1)
> Existing country
>     Yes
>     Yes
>     Yes
> Combinations of city, region, country
>     Yes (1)     Yes (1)     Yes
> *Streets*
> Existing street+city
>     Yes
>     Yes (2)     Yes (2)
> Non existing street+city
>     Yes     Yes (2)     Yes (2)
> Only street
>     Yes     Yes (2)     Yes (2)
> *Send to device
> *    
>     
>     Yes
>
>
Indeed very impressing statistics :-D
> (1) Only places tagged in the form is_in=province,region,country. 
> Those with complete is_in:province, is_in:region, is_in:country 
> tagging are not found.
I think this should be solvable. The parsing code is not a unknown piece.
> (2) Missing all streets beginning by "Calle" before "Calle Real ..."
 From my stomach I get the idea, that this could be caused by the blank 
character. Could you give it a try with osm data, in which all 
occurences of "Calle " are search and replaced by "Calle" without 
blanks? Maybe it is a problem with the sorting, so binary search does 
not work correctly. Maybe the blanks should be sorted on the opposite 
end to the characters (after/before the chars).

Another idea is, that there are to much streets beginning with the 
character combination "Calle ". Maybe there is some overflow in internal 
structures if there are more than 1024 (256, 4096, 2^16 ...?) labels 
beginning with the same characters, which would need some extra 
handling. Is it possible for you to do a quick grep on the osm files, 
how much occurences of "Calle " are there contained?

> (3) In the search results listed region information is missing.
>
> All crashing and exception messages have disappeared.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to