On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 08:59:05PM +0100, Johannes Formann wrote: >Marko Mäkelä <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 05:46:56PM +0100, Johannes Formann wrote: >> >Where should I start, my Ideas would be throwing out the countourdata, >> >geonames? >> >> If I were you, I would put the contours on a separate map layer. >> Different layers can be split at different borders. Contours ought to be >> much more constant than OSM data. Wouldn't it suffice to compile the >> contours once and then combine the compiled contours to the gmapsupp.img >> with the regularly compiled OSM data? > >Sounds like a good idea. >Do you have a good source where to look how to join those maps for the >different output formats?
Minko and Charlie just discussed some extra constraints if you have contours on a separate layer: http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2011q1/009883.html I have not bothered to experiment with contours myself. The NASA SRTM data is very inaccurate where I live, and it only covers the very south of Finland, to about 1km north of my home. My maps do contain three layers: in addition to the main (style=default) layer there are layers for style=routes (bus and bike routes and such) and style=control (speed bumps and the like). These extra layers are very sparse, and thus they cover the whole finland.osm.pbf (not split in tiles). See osm2img.sh at http://www.polkupyoraily.net/osm/ for details. Best regards, Marko _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
