El 01/05/11 16:05, Minko escribió: > Carlos, > Relation 297129 matches with the gpx file for the part that falls within the > bounds_2400000_200000.bnd file. > Relation 297049 lies totally within bounds_2400000_200000.bnd file and also > seem to match with the gpx file 10_r297049_o_0.gpx > So I think there must be something else wrong. Have you tested it also on a > GPS? I have just tested on a nuvi 300 and a legend hcx and it works fine. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Separate boundary files WanMil
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Separate boundary files Clinton Gladstone
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Separate boundary files Minko
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Separate boundary files WanMil
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Separate boundary files Minko
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Separate boundary files Minko
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Separate boundary files Carlos Dávila
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Separate boundary files Minko
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Separate boundary files Carlos Dávila
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Separate boundary files Minko
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Separate boundary files Carlos Dávila
