El 06/05/11 18:02, WanMil escribió: > Question to all: > > Should I remove the is_in:* and openGeoDB:* usage from the locator styles? > Or should I give them lowest priority (use them only if no other rule > matches)? > > What do you think? There are countries where boundary polygons/relations are completely missing. In such cases keeping is_in and openGeoDB may be useful. On the other side, if they are removed will encourage people to add such information to OSM. I think we have faced similar situations other times in the past. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country specific rules Marko Mäkelä
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country specific rules Colin Smale
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country specific rules Henning Scholland
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country specific rules Carlos Dávila
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country specific rules navmaps
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country specific rul... Carlos Dávila
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country specific... WanMil
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country spec... Carlos Dávila
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country specific... Carlos Dávila
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country spec... navmaps
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country... Carlos Dávila
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country specific rules Martin
- Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country specific rules Carlos Dávila
