Hi,
WanMil wrote > > Usually the mkgmap input tiles are larger than the processed bounding > box (splitter parameter overlap). So there are much many elements which > are processed but thrown away at a late step in mkgmap. > It makes mkgmap faster, but wouldn't it be better to filter that data in splitter? Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/PATCH-v1-Performance-improvement-by-removing-unused-elements-before-the-style-processing-tp7144978p7145963.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
