Hi Steve, thanks for the explanation, I'll verify my assumptions. Regarding your patch: I see a change in the number of evaluated rules, but it is is slightly higher with the patch. I think this proves that my understanding is wrong, but the patch is probably too special, means, it has to be modified for each set of styles.
Gerd Steve Ratcliffe wrote > > There is a slight optimisation that could be done by moving common > tags back based on the tag name. See attached patch. This reduces the > number of rules checked in two common cases in the test I ran. > -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Possible-optimization-of-StyledConverter-tp7153308p7155240.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
