Hi WanMil, okay, I agree that we might need the data. What do you think about removing it when it lies in a boundary that has the same postal_code?
Gerd > Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:22:19 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question reg. precompiled bounds > > Hi Gerd, > > it depends on how exact you want to be. > In most cases you won't require building with a postal_code tag. But if > the building contains a POI without a postal_code you might need it. > I know this example is a bit too meticulous but it shows the general > problem we have unless there is a commonly used tagging for postal_code > areas. > > WanMil > > > Hi, > > > > some of the precompiled bounds contain quite a lot of buildings with a > > postal_code tag, e.g. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/25587396 > > or > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/60792963 > > > > Is this info really needed in the location hook? It seems to slow down the > > creation of the quadtree. > > > > Ciao, > > Gerd > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Question-reg-precompiled-bounds-tp7217885p7217885.html > > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > > mkgmap-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
