Hi WanMil, sorry, I should have run the tests myself.
We see the different values because the patched version splits a few more times. I think the result is okay, but maybe there is a better solution. If I got this right, we deal with two different bounding boxes: the bounding box that is saved in the OSM data and the bounding box of all objects. I wonder if it is correct that the MapSplitter has to handle data that is outside of the OSM bounding box? These two different bboxes were the reason for some errors in the splitting process, and my patch only fixes the problem in MapSplitter / MapArea, but maybe it could be handled earlier? Gerd WanMil wrote > > Gerd, > > the SimpleRouteTest checks if the file sizes of the img files are as > expected. After commiting the subdivision change the TRE file size > changed. I think thats ok, but can you please check that yourself? > > Thanks! > WanMil > >> >> Version 2277 was commited by wanmil on 2012-05-06 20:16:39 +0100 (Sun, 06 >> May 2012) >> >> Adjust TRE size of test >> >> Commit 2276 changed the size of the TRE file by using a different >> subdivision algorithm. >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Commit-r2277-Adjust-TRE-size-of-test-tp5689583p5690595.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
