Minko <[email protected]> writes: > Chris wrote: >> I think access=permissive is correctly mapped to access=yes in mkgmap. > > I have contacted the mapper but he doesn't agree with this. > > access=permissive means that the landowner gave his permission to access this > footway.
> Footways are meant to access by foot only. So no access for all other > vehicles. So access=permissive on highway=footway is basically an error, unless it is a walking path that isn't a public right of way, on which cars may drive and people may walk. >> So the way is open for every mode of transport, cars included. >> >> If cars are not permitted foot=permissive is the correct tagging. > > If I map this road to foot=permissive, mkgmap will block this road too: > > It will add access = no but it can't add foot = yes because there is already > a tag foot = permissive That's a style file bug then. In Garmin, there is no notion of permissive, so it makes sense to map permissive to yes. > Unless mkgmap doesnt set foot = permissive to foot = yes, Garmin doesnt know > what to do and will block this for all traffic including pedestrians. > > So we are back to the discussion about bicycles from this topic: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg10590.html > I would suggest to set all vehicles access with permissive to yes, so > bicycle=permissive > bicycle=yes > foot=permissive > foot=yes > motorcar, moped, motorbike,hgv etc same sounds right > except access=permissive > delete access huh? shouldn't access=foo map to for all modes bar, bar=foo before the permissive to yes (and official to yes) mappings? Is this controversial, or just a matter of getting the code to do the right thing?
pgpYqj2UVHb8y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
