GerdP wrote > ... I see --mixed in your parameter list. I can't say for sure, but I'd > say that the new algorithm may not work correctly with mixed input. It is > on my todo list to find out. > Do you really have a mixed pbf ?
I think so - but I'm not sure ... I add elevation data to the osm data: sh /home/kto/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/osmosis/bin/osmosis --read-pbf /home/kto/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/source/Kartendaten_Freizeitkarte_Schweiz.osm.pbf --read-pbf /home/kto/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/source/Hoehendaten_Freizeitkarte_Schweiz.osm.pbf --merge --write-pbf /home/kto/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/source/Freizeitkarte_Schweiz.osm.pbf omitmetadata=true Does this osmosis call leads to a sorted result file ? Does someone knows this ? Regards Klaus -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-that-generates-problem-list-tp5734014p5734104.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
