Hi Felix,
Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > yes, I use 202 with boundingBox.patch - forgot to mention it (oh and > hope it gets integrated into trunk soon..., I currently don't want to > use the splitter branch...). somehow the patch caused a bbox to be shifted to a value smaller than -180.0 attached is a new version of the patch that makes sure that this doesn't happen. boundingBox_v2.patch <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5734525/boundingBox_v2.patch> Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/mkgmap-splitter-error-java-lang-ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException-DensityMap-subset-tp5734511p5734525.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
