Am 27.11.2012 12:47, schrieb GerdP: > Henning Scholland wrote >> But not at all. If there are larger spaces with no data, no-trim=false >> will create "ugly" looking maps. As you can see here: >> http://www.aighes.de/data/scandinavia.png world.kml was created out of >> planet.osm with scandinavia.poly and no-trim=false >> >> btw: Are there reasons to use overlap!= in combination with >> --keep-complete? Otherwise overlap=0 should be default if >> keep-complete=true. > Just to make sure that I got this right, besides the holes the only > ugly looking part is the big tile covering most of iceland, but also > a large area outside of the polygon. Correct? > Any other tile that is not acceptable? No the other tiles are ok.
> Reg. overlap: I agree that overlap should be ignored with --keep-complete. > I just don't have enough experience to decide this alone. > I wasnot sure whether overlap=0 should be forced with --keep-complete or > whether it should be ignored only if user did not explicitely specify a > value. > I think forcing overlap=0 is the better solution. +1 Henning _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
