> A relation with route=ferry should be handled, because there are some > (many ?) ferry-routes are tagged as such a relation and member are empty > ways.
Can you give an example of such a route and how you work with it in mkgmap? Why must all parts of the relation be complete in a tile? > > If superrelation are handled by splitter, I would keep this and improve > mkgmap. Maybe type=route could be handled like type=boundary. So keep > relation and all ways in a tile, which crossing the tile or have at > least one node in the tile. superrelations are not handled by mkgmap (AFAIK) so there is no need to handle them with splitter? Once there is a good reason to process them with mkgmap splitter should also handle them but not the other way round. > > Henning WanMil _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
