GerdP wrote > > Steve Ratcliffe wrote >>> The main difference seems to be polygons. > Yes, the problem is probably in the o5m reader of mkgmap. I am looking at > it.
By mistake the o5m reader did not call keepTag() for the tags of ways. I've verified now that the styled-converter "sees" the same data when using o5m, so output of mkgmap should be similar again. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Commit-r2412-merge-the-o5m-support-branch-tp5740691p5740827.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
