Hi all, did anybody notice that splitter still ignores sub-relations when xml is used as input? Is that intended? I guess no. The question is: Should this be added to the xml parser or can we drop xml support (for input) in splitter ?
I assume xml is most often only used to test something, but in this case it should work the same way as pbf or o5m, right? Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-xml-support-tp5741216.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
