Roger Calvert wrote > Comparison of the 'before' and 'after' pbf files with a hex editor shows > that they are very different (although they are the same at line 1 > column 1). The 'after' file is about 230k smaller (in about 5M) than the > 'before' file.
The different size is probably ok. The pbf format has a parameter that allows to set a "batchsize". This size influences the compression ratio. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Problem-with-osmconvert-pbf-files-tp5742471p5742520.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
