Hi Gerd, thanks for the reminder. I have commited it.
If anybody detects a difference please let me know. WanMil > Hi WanMil, > > did you ever continue on this? > I found this comment in MapBuilder.java > // shapes do not have address information > > Gerd > > > WanMil wrote >> Hi, >> >> I have started writing some pages for the new mkgmap documentation about >> address search. This made me thinking if the address include is required >> for the polygons style file. Is it possible to see the address >> information of a polygon in a Garmin map (or better a mkgmap created map)? >> >> If the answer is no we could remove the include from the polygons style >> file which saves some memory and some processing steps. Additionally we >> could remove the processing of polygons from the LocationHook. >> >> The only thing that need to be changed is the -add-pois-to-areas option. >> The POIs created by this option must be worked out by the LocationHook >> because the polygons do not contain the address info any more. But I >> think this would be easy. >> >> Any comments? >> >> WanMil >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Address-include-in-polygons-style-file-superfluous-tp5744939p5752539.html > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
