Thanks for this. I'd already realised a more generic approach was better than an mkgmap specific one.
Thanks Paul On 12/04/13 08:25, Henning Scholland wrote: > Am 12.04.2013 00:02, schrieb News: >> Like you I think this is a useful option which should stay so I guess >> it's down to us to drum up some action on the wiki although I'll confess >> that I don't know where the best place to start is as I haven't spent >> much time on any wiki let alone one as large and well established as >> OSM. However if you feel you have the knowledge to make a start point me >> at the relevant page and I'll gladly pitch in > > Hi Paul, > typical you should set up a proposal. If you search the wiki for > proposal you should find the necessary information. After creating the > proposal you should write to tagging-ML and partisipate in a discussion > with other mappers. If this relation is already used, this discussion > could be quite short. Just a hint: don't argue with 'mkgmap needs it', > but say 'router will need it'. ;) > > Henning > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
