Hi Steve, okay, sounds reasonable. For now I'll disable the check in display tool. By the way: NetCheck evalualtes the counter with 10 bits , but your patch only writes the lower 8 bits. Is this because we never have more than 255 points in one way? If yes: why is the img format using 10 bits for the counter? I assume it is for a roadDef that combines several parts?
Gerd Steve Ratcliffe wrote > Hi Gerd, > > On 30/04/13 09:07, GerdP wrote: >> I don't understand why the node-count value is compared with def.nblocks >> The write routine in mkgmap doesn't write the number of nodes to the >> place >> where display tool reads the def.nblocks value. > > I was developing a patch to fill in that value. > > Although it seems to work without it, I thought it might be the > cause of the routing problem with house numbers active. But anyway > there is no harm in having it filled in. > > The current patch is attached. There is still some debugging in which > I will tidy up later. > > ..Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > Write_block_count_for_housenumbers.patch (17K) > <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/attachment/5759155/0/Write_block_count_for_housenumbers.patch> -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/question-reg-display-tool-tp5759106p5759235.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
