Hi, Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > I deem in future we need to have an option in the style-file - to > declare ways, which should be moved by mkgmap in such a way, that the > resulting connection lies on a straight line of the other ways it meets! > Else as soon as this micromapping gets more - the will be no more usable > maps in cities. (not showing these ways is no help, as there are now > additional nodes as part of the streets, and there needs to be some > clever algorythm to delete such nodes.
While working on the removeShortArcsByMergingNodes() method I also noticed these effects. Quite often you find the situation that a node of the large road is merged with a node tagged as barrier on a cycleway which leads to this road. There is no simple rule which node is kept, so it happens quite often that the "more important" node is moved. Example: the node with the barrier at http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/255210570 is likely to be merged with http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/26965075 This also partly explains why round-abouts are looking so ugly. I was working on a patch for this, I think I'll continue when it's getting cooler again. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/misshapen-roundabouts-tp5770187p5771445.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
