On 06/10/13 12:58, GerdP wrote: > @Steve: I guess we should catch this case and > omit the point, or should we move the > value so that the point lies inside the boundary?
My guess is that it should be left in and not moved. As far as I can tell it is inevitable in the general case that points on the lower resolution layers are outside the bounds. Its just that we cut the tiles with alignment so that this doesn't normally happen, but in general tiles can have irregular shapes. ..Steve _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
