Hi, yes, 0x11f00 is recognized as an extended type. What bug do you mean? Should mkgmap interpret 0x11f as 0x11f00 when used in the lines or polygons file?
Gerd > Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 02:07:24 -0800 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles > > Hi > > Interesting 'bug' when using check-styles. > > It had me foxed as it actually by chance highlighted lines I didn't use in > my TYP file. > > invalid type 0x11f for POLYLINE > > It transpires that when replacing 11f with 11f00 the type number is > correctly identified as valid. > I checked it with several lines, with and without the zero subtypes. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157.html > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
