Hi all

This has been mentioned before but hoping that someone has had a chance to 
investigate why POI searches work on some Garmins, and not on others. 

We have a growing collection of Garmins and have noticed the following. 

62s the search works but slowly. Could be a unit slow processor issue. 

Fenix. Well anything can happen from the unit hanging to working.  Me think 
that I am being rather ambitious expecting it to work on the searches. 

Rino 650, search does not work. 

Oregon 450, a new unit to us, but works well. 

Be great if the reversed engineering could examine why mkgmap works on some 
Garmins but not on others.  At least identify "good" Garmins would be a start. 

We are also trying to identify routing issues between units but have held off 
until I updated to the latest version of mkgmap. 

Gradually getting my act together to update mkgmap more frequently so be better 
placed to test the releases. 

Cheers
Brett Russell
PO Box 94
Launceston Tas. 7250
Australia
0419 374 971

> On 23 Mar 2014, at 11:37 pm, "Brett Russell" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> As mentioned the waterfall rendering of a 6508 worked a treat rendering as 
> per the custom graphic.  Need to see how it now looks as I can now generate a 
> img. I use a Garmin 62s and Rino 650.   Hopefully, the waterfalls will still 
> show as POI. 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Brett Russell
> 237 Oldaker Street
> Devonport Tas 7310
> 
> Phone: (03) 6424 8033
> Mobile: 0419 374 971
> 
>> On 23 Mar 2014, at 9:36 pm, "nwillink" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Modern Garmin TOPOs do not seem to include subtypes if value is <&100.
>> You have 65 with subtype 08
>> I am surprised 6508 got rendered before.
>> 
>> I have seen examples of 4b01, 5002 etc in old topo typ files but I've never
>> been able to
>> use them with any version of mkgmap
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/dissapearing-roads-tp5800690p5800725.html
>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to