Selon Gerd Petermann <[email protected]>: > Hi Paco,
Hi Gerd, > I think it is a very simple change, see attached patch. > I don't know why it wasn't always done. > Does anybody expect a problem if we add/replace the name=* tag of a > Relation? I looked at the patch but I can't guess if it's effective. I can give you an example of what I'd like. When mkgmap analyses a route relation (e.g. bicycle route), I'd like the mkgmap name variable set to the OSM "name:xx" tag as per the name-tag-list parameter instead of the OSM "name" tag. If your patch does this, then fine for me :) _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
