Hi all,
I've just modified a routine that translates the vehicle types used
in OSM to the ones used in Garmin restrictions:
if(vehicle.equals("motorcar") || vehicle.equals("motorcycle") ||
vehicle.equals("motor_vehicle"))
flag = RouteRestriction.EXCEPT_CAR;
else if(vehicle.equals("psv") || vehicle.equals("bus"))
flag = RouteRestriction.EXCEPT_BUS;
else if(vehicle.equals("taxi"))
flag = RouteRestriction.EXCEPT_TAXI;
else if(vehicle.equals("delivery") || vehicle.equals("goods"))
flag = RouteRestriction.EXCEPT_DELIVERY;
else if(vehicle.equals("bicycle"))
flag = RouteRestriction.EXCEPT_BICYCLE;
else if(vehicle.equals("hgv") || vehicle.equals("truck"))
flag = RouteRestriction.EXCEPT_TRUCK;
if (flag == 0){
log.warn(messagePrefix, "ignoring unsupported vehicle
class '" + vehicle
+ "' in turn restriction");
return false;
} else { ...}
I think that this should better be done in the style?
I also wonder why the wiki lists different kinds of vehicles for
restriction:<vehicle>=<turn> , type=restriction:<vehicle> , and except=*
I hope it is okay to use the same code for all of them?
Gerd
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/vehicles-in-restriction-relations-tp5801618.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
