Hi , the current wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Tags
documents these restriction texts: no_right_turn / no_left_turn / no_u_turn / no_straight_on / only_right_turn / only_left_turn / only_straight_on / no_entry / no_exit current mkgmap allows typos like no_turn_right , no_turn_xyz (anything that starts with no_turn) as well as all strings that start with only_turn It prints a warning for them, but doesn't ignore them. I found 14 no_turn_on_red restrictions like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2033334 which probably should not be interpreted like normal restrictions, so I think mkgmap should not accept generics. OK? Gerd > Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 13:23:35 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] restriction relations with wrong restriction text > > On Sun, Apr 13, Gerd Petermann wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > should mkgmap ignore if a no_left_turn restriction doesn't describe a > > no_left_turn? > > > > For example, look at this > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3414378 > > That's around the corner of my old flat, I know the area very well. > The text is correct, the to way is wrong. I will fix that. > I think in such cases you should ignore the restriction and > print a warning, so that people can fix it. > > > In short: the restriction should be ignored after printing a warning. > > Correct. > > Thorsten > > -- > Thorsten Kukuk, Senior Architect SLES & Common Code Base > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg > GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
