Hi Bernd, I tried both, and the smaller values seemed to work better for mkgmap. I guess it depends on the input files what value is best, but at least the default 1009 doesn't work well, so any much higher prime value should help.
Gerd > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 17:30:48 +0200 > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Java tuning hint > > Am Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2014, 17:13:43 schrieb Gerd Petermann: > > In short, try java run time parameter > > -XX:StringTableSize=100003 for mkgmap. > > IMHO you forgot a Zero ;-) > > -XX:StringTableSize=1000003 > > Bernd > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
