Hi Minko,
> I found out that the routing errors still exist when you have two routable
> lines on top of each other,
> one with and one without road speed/class parameters. If the GPS finds an
> address on such road, routing goes mad. In my style I use type 0x02 for all
> cycleroutes. I need to use 0x02 because this is one of the few type that are
> always rendered on top of all other lines.
just to make sure:
your style creates two lines for one OSM way, they have different types, but
both below 0x3f,
and one has road speed/class , the other has not.
Which one come first?
>
> If it were possible to skip address search on the last routable line somehow
> I could make it not routable, but I'm not sure.
For mkgmap, a routable line is one that has a road speed/class and a
non-extended type.
I am not familiar with the code regarding indexes for address search.
I don't know ihow this is related to routing.
>
> Normally multiple routable lines are not often needed, so the removal of
> those warnings is still ok.
I think when it causes problems, we should try to find a better solution or
print a warning.
Gerd
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
