As there are clearly differences in features supported by various models, would it maybe be an idea to externalise the differences in some way? How about a file to contain the capabilities of device types, an option to target a particular entry in that file, and a way to expose the selected device in the style files? That could also help address the differences in supported POI categories and icons.
Colin On 2014-05-11 11:52, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi Minko, > > thanks for your help. This is now implemented with r3269. > > Gerd > >> Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 11:45:47 +0200 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding >> routable/non-routable types. >> >>> what about 0xa ? Or was that meant to be 0x1a ? >> >> Hi Gerd >> >> 0x0a gives also a routing error, so everything in the range >> 0x01-0x13, 0x16 and 0x1b >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev [1] Links: ------ [1] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
