Hi Gerd,
thanks for this hint, I have played around with it and was successfull in most
of the cases.
Here my working solutions:
ok 1) If there is opening_hours set, show this info before the phone number.
opening_hours=* { set mkgmap:phone=' (${opening_hours}) ${mkgmap:phone|def:}'
}
ok 2) If there is a website, show this info after the phone number.
website=* { set mkgmap:phone='${mkgmap:phone|def:} ${website}' }
In one example I was not successfull.
I am generating 1-point POIs for all points where only the addr tags are set,
but no other tags available.
This will show all the housenumbers in low resolution.
As addr info I would like to get the full addr incl. street, postcode and so on.
I tried with different solutions but nothing worked, I am getting the name-tag
filled but not the addr-field.
Here my code:
addr:housenumber=* | addr:unit=* | addr:door=*
{ name '${addr:unit}/${addr:door}' |
'${addr:housenumber}/${addr:unit}' |
'${addr:door}' |
'${addr:unit}' |
'${addr:housenumber}';
set addr:postcode='${addr:street|def:} ${addr:housenumber|def:}
${addr:postcode|def:} ${addr:city|def:} ${addr:country|def:}'
} [0x1e04 resolution 24]
The first part is working fine, I can see the housenumber or unit + door on all
buildings and also as point if there is no building.
The second part is not working, the postcode tag is not written into the
addr-field.
Is there any restriction with the addr-field of the POI-info if no other tags
are available than the addr:xxx tags?
Walter
From: Gerd Petermann
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 7:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] difference between addlabel and poi-address
Hi Walter,
I think the POI info is filled in StyledConverter. This source snippet shows
the corresponding tags:
private static final short countryTagKey =
TagDict.getInstance().xlate("mkgmap:country");
private static final short regionTagKey =
TagDict.getInstance().xlate("mkgmap:region");
private static final short cityTagKey =
TagDict.getInstance().xlate("mkgmap:city");
private static final short postal_codeTagKey =
TagDict.getInstance().xlate("mkgmap:postal_code");
private static final short streetTagKey =
TagDict.getInstance().xlate("mkgmap:street");
private static final short housenumberTagKey =
TagDict.getInstance().xlate("mkgmap:housenumber");
private static final short phoneTagKey =
TagDict.getInstance().xlate("mkgmap:phone");
Be aware that some values like mkgmap:street and mkgmap:housenumber are used
for the --housenumbers
option as well, and others are used for the indexes.
I think the only tag that can be used for other purposes is mkgmap:phone.
Gerd
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 00:24:11 +0100
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] difference between addlabel and poi-address
>
> Hi WanMil,
>
> thanks, so I know now that my device can show address info but no additional
> label info.
>
> I am trying to add specific information to the field that is normaly used
> for address.
>
> Is there any direct way via command or any indirect way via overrulement of
> special fields?
>
> I found one exampe 4.5 on page 29 of the Style rules docu,
> but this is only showing how to overrule the postcode parameter.
>
> Walter
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> From: WanMil
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 10:16 PM
> To: Development list for mkgmap
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] difference between addlabel and poi-address
>
> Hi Walter,
>
> you are right. POIs have address fields that are usually filled by
> mkgmap and that is what you see.
>
> Each POI also have 4 label fields but usually only the first label is
> shown (but that might also differ between differnent devices).
>
> WanMil
>
> > I’m not sure but I think I am mixing 2 things up.
> > When I enable poi-address I can see the address field of the POI filled
> > with the address on my Oregon device.
> > When I set no-poi-address and try to fill the address field individually
> > by using addlabel,
> > and do not see these labels in the POI address field.
> > Maybe addlabel is filling total different fields not available on my
> > Oregon.
> > Can anybody approve my assumption?
> > Is it right, that the Oregan is not displaying the 4 addlabel fields?
> > Walter
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
