Hi Steve, okay, fine. Any ideas for the names of the sub classes?
I am not so sure that we should call 0 an invalid number, I think I read somewhere that 0 is used. Taginfo also reports that, but that doesn't mean they are correct, as I also see -1 in Canvec imports. Gerd Steve Ratcliffe wrote > I'm all for using Numbers as the top level class name. > > You probably noticed that I added a check for negative and zero number in > netcheck. Found a few in a UK map, so good catch. > > ..Steve > > >> >>So, maybe we should keep the name Numbers for the topmost class as it >>also coresponds to the >>name in the polish format? >> >>Gerd >> >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>_______________________________________________ >>mkgmap-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >>http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Patch-v2-and-thoughts-about-class-names-tp5841432p5841471.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
