How about mkgmap:non-routable=yes ?
However, I don’t quite understand the reason behind the concept – surely if the road is under construction you can just set the type to be a non-routable one. If you are reusing a routable type, but telling the device not to allow routing down it, there will be scratched heads when you can’t route along a road that looks no different to any other. Regards, Mike From: Alexandre Loss [mailto:alexandre.l...@gmail.com] Sent: 16 October 2015 19:47 To: Development list for mkgmap <mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways I agree also that "mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes" is more clear. 2015-10-16 15:05 GMT-03:00 Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com <mailto:gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> >: Hi Ben, thanks for the feedback. I also think that mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes is better. Gerd _____ Von: mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> > im Auftrag von Ben Konrath <b...@bagu.org <mailto:b...@bagu.org> > Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Oktober 2015 19:52 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways Hi Gerd, Thanks for creating this patch. I ran a build with the patch and everything seemed work fine. I installed the map into BaseCamp without problems. I didn't specifically test a highway=construction way though. As for the option name, using something like 'mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes' would be better because it makes the option easier to understand at a glance for people, such as myself, who don't know the nomenclature of the Garmin map format. Thanks, Ben On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com <mailto:gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> > wrote: sorry, forgot to mention that GPSMapEdit seems to have a problem with these roads. It shows the road as routable with more or less unpredictable attributes. But Garmin software seems to work fine. Gerd _____ From: gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com <mailto:gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:02:23 +0200 Subject: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways Hi all, attached patch implements the new internal tag mkgmap:add-to-NOD=false to handle the issue discussed here: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/don-t-route-through-highway-construction-tt5856734.html It shows how to use it in the default style. I've also added a rule to ignore highway=planned like highway=proposed If you don't like the rather technical name mkgmap:add-to-NOD, please let me know it, here are my ideas for alternatives: mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes mkgmap:routable=no mkgmap:address-search-only=yes Gerd _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
